The Sunnah and the hadith sciences

From the establishment of the Sunnah to understanding the hadith and acting on it

Eight teaching chapters that build the picture from the foundation of the Sunnah's authority to criticism of the chain and the text, then takhrij, fiqh and following. Each chapter explains the idea, the tool of the hadith scholar, a practical example, and what the learner should come away with.

The map of knowledge

Eight chapters that form a real foundation in the science of hadith

They are not titles to memorise; open each chapter and read it in order, then apply the suggested example.

01The principleThe authority and function of the Sunnah

What do you learn?

The Sunnah is revelation and explanation from the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, and the Qur'an commands obeying him, following him and referring to his Sunnah. The major acts of worship are not understood from the words of the Qur'an alone; the Sunnah made clear the description of the prayer, the amounts of zakat and the rites of Hajj, explained the general, restricted the unrestricted and specified the general.

How does the Sunnah work with the Qur'an?

  • It confirms: What came in origin in the Qur'an.
  • It clarifies: The general and explains the prophetic application.
  • It specifies and restricts: According to the indication of the texts and their combination.
  • It brings rulings established from the Prophet ﷺ: Within the framework of what Allah made obligatory of obeying him.
02The structureThe chain and the text: how did the report reach us?

The chain (isnad)

The series of men who narrated from one another until the report reaches the Prophet ﷺ or the Companion or one below. The hadith scholar looks at the continuity of the chain, the possibility of meeting and hearing, and the state of each narrator.

The text (matn)

It is the wording of the report itself. It is not enough that the meaning seems good; the hadith scholars also look at differences in wording, contradiction, additions, and whether the error came from a particular narrator.

Why both together?

Because a report may be narrated with a chain that looks good and then a defect appears by comparison, and the meaning may be narrated through multiple routes so that the preserved narration becomes clear.

03The rulingSahih, hasan, da'if and mawdu'

The sahih in general

What has a connected chain by narration of a just, fully accurate narrator from his like, and is free from irregularity and damaging defect. These conditions work together; the mere reliability of the men is not enough if there is a break, contradiction or defect.

The hasan

It is an accepted hadith below the rank of sahih in accuracy, with the basic conditions of acceptance being met. Some weak reports may rise if their routes are many and their weakness is tolerable, and this chapter needs the examination of the people of the craft.

Weak is not fabricated

Weakness has degrees and causes: a break, a weak narrator, confusion, contradiction... As for the fabricated, it is the lie that was invented, so the two terms are not equated.

04The menNarrators, criticism and praise

What did the critics study?

The narrator's uprightness and religion, his accuracy and memory, his teachers and students, dates of birth and death and travel, and comparison of his narration with the narrations of his peers. Criticism and praise (jarh and ta'dil) is a science with wordings and ranks, not a door to personal attack.

Why do the scholars' expressions differ?

A critic may know of the narrator's state what others did not know, and the meaning of a word may differ according to the critic's terminology. So the statements are gathered and understood in their context, and a single description is not taken without balancing.

05PrecisionDefects: why is the first glance not enough?

A defect ('illah) is a hidden cause that affects the soundness of the hadith although its appearance may seem sound. Defects appear by much collecting and comparing and knowing the narrators' hadiths and their ranks.

Forms the student trains on

  • Most narrated it as halted (mawquf) at a Companion, and a narrator contradicted and raised it to the Prophet ﷺ.
  • The memorisers narrated it as mursal, and another narrator connected it.
  • The reliable narrators differed over the name of a shaykh or an effective wording.

The existence of a difference does not mean the hadith is false; the critics study the indications to know the preserved form.

06ResearchTakhrij and gathering routes

Takhrij is not merely a hadith number

  1. You identify the place of the hadith in the original sources.
  2. You gather its routes and close wordings.
  3. You distinguish the corroborations and supports.
  4. You notice the differences in chain and text.
  5. You transmit the ruling of the people of knowledge with its reason if possible.

Then you write the result clearly: the source, the place, the grade of the hadith, and who ruled on it.

07UnderstandingFiqh of the hadith and gathering the texts

The establishment of the hadith is a first step; then comes understanding it in the light of the Qur'an and the other Sunnah, the Arabic language, the context of the chapter and the words of the Companions and jurists. The text may be general with a specifier, or unrestricted with a restrictor, or a command surrounded by indications that show its degree.

Common mistakes this chapter prevents

  • Building a broad ruling on one hadith while leaving the rest of the texts.
  • Cutting a sentence out of a long explanation.
  • Transmitting the hadith ruling as if it alone sufficed for the fiqh fatwa.
08The fruitFollowing and bid'ah: from knowledge to action

The aim of the soundness of transmission is good following. Acts of worship are based on stopping at the text: no time, number or form is made obligatory for worship except by evidence. Conversely, not every modern means or worldly habit is made a 'Shari'ah bid'ah' merely because it is new.

A practical scale

  • Is the act an intended act of worship or a means and a habit?
  • If it is worship: what is its origin and the evidence for its form?
  • Has a specification of time, number or form been added that needs evidence?
  • Does the understanding of the Salaf and scholars of the text agree with the understanding we want to apply?