Source-linked summaryQur’an

May a menstruating woman recite the Qur'an from memory?

Short answer

The preponderant view of the Shaykh is the permissibility of the menstruating woman and the woman in post-natal bleeding reciting the Qur'an from memory without touching the Mushaf, because their period is long and they are not like the junub.

Evidence and explanation

The Shaykh weakened the hadith that prevents the menstruating woman from reciting, and distinguished between her and the junub on the basis of the length of the period.

Scholar referenced

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Baz, may Allah have mercy on him

This editorial summary is based on the original source linked below and is not presented as a verbatim quotation from the scholar.

Short literal excerpts from the original Arabic page; no preference from the site

From the text of the answer (Arabic, with an English translation)

Original answer — Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Baz

حكم قراءة الحائض للقرآن دون مس المصحف — فتوى ١٨٦١٠
Question

«تسأل أختنا وتقول: ما حكم قراءة الحائض للقرآن بدون أن تمس المصحف؟»

English translation (unreviewed): Our sister asks, saying: What is the ruling on a menstruating woman reciting the Qur'an without touching the Mushaf?

From the text of the answer

«في هذه المسألة خلاف بين العلماء والأقرب والأظهر أنه لا حرج؛ لأن مدتها تطول ليست مثل الجنب، الجنب مدته قصيرة يغتسل ثم يقرأ، أما الحائض والنفساء فإن مدتهما تطول؛ فالأرجح والأصوب أنه لا حرج عليهما في القراءة عن ظهر قلب، هذا هو الأصل، ولا يجوز أن يقاس الحيض على الجنابة، فالحيض مدته تطول والنفاس أطول، أما حديث: لا تقرأ الحائض ولا الجنب شيئًا من القرآن ، فهو حديث ضعيف عند أهل العلم لا تقوم به الحجة، فالراجح أنه لا حرج عليها -يعني: الحائض- أن تقرأ القرآن عن ظهر قلب، لا من المصحف بل عن ظهر قلب، وهكذا النفساء، من باب أولى.»

English translation (unreviewed): On this matter there is a disagreement among the scholars, and the closer and clearer view is that there is no harm, because her period is long; she is not like the junub. The junub's period is short; he performs ghusl and then recites. But the menstruating woman and the woman in post-natal bleeding, their period is long, so the preponderant and more correct view is that there is no harm for them in reciting from memory. This is the default; and menstruation may not be compared to janabah, since menstruation is long and post-natal bleeding is longer. As for the hadith “The menstruating woman and the junub do not recite anything of the Qur'an”, it is a weak hadith according to the scholars, which is not a valid proof. So the preponderant view is that there is no harm for her — meaning the menstruating woman — to recite the Qur'an from memory, not from the Mushaf, but from memory; and likewise the woman in post-natal bleeding, all the more so.

Evidence as the shaykh cited it

«أما الجنب فلا، الجنب لا يقرأ القرآن لا عن ظهر قلب ولا من المصحف؛ للحديث الصحيح أن النبي عليه السلام كان لا يمنعه شيء من القرآن إلا الجنابة ، وفي رواية أخرى: أنه ﷺ قرأ بعض الآيات ثم قال: هذا لمن ليس جنباً، أما الجنب ولا آية .»

English translation (unreviewed): As for the junub, no: the junub does not recite the Qur'an, neither from memory nor from the Mushaf, because of the authentic hadith that nothing prevented the Prophet, peace be upon him, from the Qur'an except janabah; and in another narration: that he ﷺ recited some verses and then said: “This is for one who is not junub; as for the junub, not even a verse.”

Read the scholar’s original material ↗

The Arabic excerpts matched the original page word for word by an automated check and have not had human scholarly review. The English translations are unreviewed translations made for this site; they are not an approved Shari‘ah translation. Rely on the Arabic original.

Source

Ruling on the menstruating woman reciting the Qur'an without touching the Mushaf

Title of the original page (Arabic): حكم قراءة الحائض للقرآن دون مس المصحف

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Baz, may Allah have mercy on him

Open the original source ↗

Related issues

Method noteThis is an editorial summary linked to a source, translated from the Arabic; independent review of its fidelity and of the translation is still pending. Personal cases whose rulings depend on individual facts should be presented with their details to qualified scholars.